The e-Journal of Neonatology Research

Your open access, online source for everything in neonatology

Nasal CPAP After Extubation

without comments

[PDF]

Levels of Nasal CPAP Applied During the Immediate Post-Extubation Phase: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Ratchada Kitsommart MD1,2, Angela Kalyn MHSc, RNC1, Noura Al-Saleem MD1, Marianne Janes RNC1, Guilherme M. Sant’Anna MD, PhD3

1Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal Division, McMaster Children’s Hospital, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

2Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal Division, Siriraj hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

3Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal Division, Montreal Children’s Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada

 

Address correspondence:

Guilherme Mendes Sant’Anna, MD, PhD, FRCPC

Department of Pediatrics

Division of Neonatology

Montreal Children’s Hospital
McGill University

2300 Tupper Street

Room C912

Montreal, Québec, Canada H3H 1P3

E-mail: guilherme.santanna@mcgill.ca

Author Disclosure: The authors have nothing to disclose. Dr. Sant’Anna was supported by research funds from the Research Institute of the Montreal Children’s Hospital, McGill University.  This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00636324

ABSTRACT

Background: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is a common form of non-invasive respiratory support used in newborns. The adequate level of pressure that should be used during the post-extubation phase is unknown. The most often used pressure is 5 cmH2O but different levels have never been compared. The objective of this study was compare the effect of high (HP) versus normal (NP) nCPAP levels on the rate of successful extubation. 

Methods: Randomized controlled pilot trial on preterm infants born with birth weight <1250 g. After extubation, infants were randomized to nCPAP of 8 cmH2O (HP) or 5 cmH2O (NP). Primary outcome was successful extubation. Failure was defined as the need of re-intubation within 72 hours post-extubation.

Results: A total of 24 infants were enrolled; 13 patients to HP and 11 to NP. There were no difference in the rates of successful extubation (54% vs 55%), extubation failure (46% vs. 45%; OR 1.03 CI 0.21, 5.15), air leaks, late reintubation, nasal septum trauma, feeding intolerance, or maximum FiO2 between the two groups. Infants in the HP group spent more days on nCPAP than infants in the NP group.

Conclusion: In this pilot study there were no differences in the rate of successful extubation or complications in infants extubated to higher or normal nCPAP levels, but due to the small sample size our results are inconclusive. Further trials with larger sample size and long-term clinical outcomes are required.

Key Words: extubation failure, nasal CPAP, airway pressure, preterm infants, very low birth weight infants

INTRODUCTION

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) has been used for decades as a form of non-invasive respiratory support in newborns.1-3 Two large randomized control trials have demonstrated that early use of nCPAP can provide adequate support to extreme preterm infants but 46% to 83% of these infants ultimately required endotracheal intubation and ventilation during their hospital stay.4,5 To minimize complications associated with mechanical ventilation, early extubation has been proposed6-8 but some infants can develop progressive respiratory failure and require re-intubation within hours or days.9-11

Preterm infants have a relatively high chest wall compliance which does not favor the maintenance of functional residual capacity above the closing volume; an essential requirement for adequate gas exchange without the need of a large work of breathing.12 Physiological and clinical studies have demonstrated improvements in lung volume and respiratory system mechanics in preterm infant’s extubated to nCPAP.13,14 The use of nCPAP also decreases the rates of extubation failure at variable reported rates.15,16 This large variability can be partially explained by differences between interfaces, delivering systems, local experience with the use of nCPAP and/or the level of nCPAP pressure applied.17-19

The adequate level of nCPAP pressure that should be used during the post-extubation period is still unknown; a meta-analysis of previous studies suggested a minimum pressure of 5 cmH2O.15 Several physiological studies have demonstrated that inadequate low pressures increases work of breathing and chest wall distortion whereas higher pressures improve thoraco-abdominal synchrony and end-expiratory lung volume.14,20,21 However, different levels of nCPAP have never been compared. Therefore, we designed this randomized controlled trial to investigate a possible beneficial effect of higher nCPAP levels during the first 72 hours post-extubation. The primary objective of the study was to compare the rate of successful extubation in preterm infants extubated to high (8 cmH2O) or normal nCPAP levels (5 cmH2O).

METHODS

Population

Eligible patients were infants with a birth weight (BW) between 500 – 1250 grams, appropriate for gestational age, on mechanical ventilation, and ready for the first elective extubation attempt before 14 days of age. Infants with lethal or upper airway abnormalities, severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III or IV), neuromuscular disorders, and congenital heart disease were excluded. The trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT00636324 and the protocol was approved by the Hamilton Health Sciences Research Ethics Board. Informed consent from parents or legal guardians was obtained before randomization.

Study Design

During the study period mechanical ventilation was managed according to a protocol previously reported.8 Preterm infants would be considered for extubation if: a) BW ≤ 1000 g: Mean airway pressure (MAP) < 7 cmH2O and FiO2 ≤ 0.30; or b) BW > 1000 g: MAP < 8 cmH2O and FiO2 ≤ 0.30. However, the final decision was made by the team responsible for the infant care. The study was an unblinded randomized controlled trial where we applied block randomization, in random blocks of four or six, to assign eligible infants into the groups in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization used sequential numbered sealed opaque envelopes from a computer-generated randomization list. Multiple birth infants were randomized independently. Although blinding was not possible, the person responsible for the data analysis was not aware of the group assignment.

Study Intervention

After randomization, infants were extubated to a normal pressure (NP) – 5cmH2O or high pressure (HP) – 8cmH2O nasal CPAP. In the NP group, the pressure could be weaned to 4 cmH2O in infants with low PaCO2 (< 50 mmHg and pH > 7.25), minimal O2 requirements (FiO2 < 0.25) or anterior-posterior chest x-rays showing increased lung volume (> 9 intercostal spaces) or increased to 6 cmH2O if the infant revealed any sign of respiratory deterioration, which included increase in PaCO2 (> 70 mmHg and pH < 7.25), oxygen requirement (FiO2 > 0.3), and work of breathing (significant intercostal and/or subdiaphragmatic retractions), persistent tachypnea, and/or apneic episodes (> 6 episodes within a 6-hour period). For the HP group, the pressure could be decreased to 7 cmH2O or increased to 9 cmH2O based on the same criteria used for the NP group. Therefore, pressure ranges of 4 to 6 cmH2O or 7 to 9 cmH2O were used and kept for the entire 72 hour period. Infants failing NP nCPAP could be changed to HP nCPAP or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) but were considered a failure. Blood gas analysis was obtained four hours after extubation and every 12 hours thereafter.

Nasal CPAP was provided through short binasal prongs (INCA® prongs; Ackrad Labs, Copper Surgical, Trumbull, CT) and the Drager Babylog 8000+ ventilator (Dräger Medical, Lübeck, Germany). During nCPAP infants were fed according to the unit protocol, through an orogastric tube. Suctioning of the airways, use of seal (Cannulaide; Beevers Manufacturing, McMinnville, OR), and positioning of a roll below the shoulders was performed whenever necessary, to assure upper airway patency and adequate sealing. These details were checked frequently in infants presenting with episodes of desaturation, bradycardia, and increased oxygen requirement and/or hypercapnia before any change in ventilatory support was made. The FiO2 was set to maintain SaO2 between 88% and 92% per unit protocol.

The primary outcome was continued extubation 72 hours post-extubation. Extubation failure was defined by the presence of one of the following criteria: a) persistent respiratory acidosis (pH < 7.20 and PaCO2 > 70 mm Hg) on two consecutive arterial or capillary measurements that were performed within a minimal interval of 1 hour; b) consistent increase in FiO2 requirement above 0.5 (> 2 hours) to maintain SaO2 between 88 % and 92%; c) six or more episodes of apnea requiring mild or moderate stimulation within a 6-hour period, or d) one severe episode of apnea requiring bag and mask positive pressure ventilation. The study ended 72 hours after extubation or when infants satisfied failure criteria. Secondary outcomes were reintubation within 72 hours and between 72 hours and 7 days after extubation, duration of nCPAP, maximum FiO2 during nCPAP therapy and occurrence of potential side effects such as air leak, intraventricular hemorrhage, nasal septum trauma, and feeding intolerance that required interruption of feeding for more than 24 hours.

Statistical Analysis

Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Baseline characteristics were described separately for each group using descriptive statistics. Differences between treatment groups in categorical variables were tested with the Fisher’s exact test and odds ratio (95% confidence interval). The number of days on nCPAP and the maximum FiO2 during nCPAP treatment were compared using the unpaired t-test and mean difference (95% confidence interval). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

From July 2007 to December 2008 a total of 24 infants were enrolled in the study. (Figure 1) During this period the unit adopted the use of nCPAP immediately after birth as standard of care resulting in fewer infants submitted to invasive ventilation. There were no differences between NP and HP groups in patient demographics (Table 1) and rate of extubation failure (45% and 46%, respectively; OR = 1.03, 95% CI, 0.21 to 5.15). In the NP group infants failed extubation due to respiratory acidosis (1), FiO2 requirements > 0.5 (1), protocol violation (1) or frequent apneas (2) whereas in the HP group the causes of failure were respiratory acidosis (1), FiO2 requirement > 0.5 (3) and frequent apneas (2).

In the NP group, 3 out of 5 infants that failed the clinical criteria had their nCPAP level increased above the pre-specified range and one infant was switched to NIPPV. These 4 infants remained extubated. Only one infant was re-intubated after the nCPAP pressure was increased to 8 cmH2O for a period of < 1 hour, due to a gram negative sepsis. In the HP group only one infant with frequent apneas was switched to NIPPV and did not require re-intubation. The other 5 were re-intubated; four of them while receiving nCPAP pressure of 9 cmH2O and one due to sudden apnea requiring bag and mask ventilation. Therefore, the overall rate of re-intubation within 72 hours was 25%; 9% and 38% in the NP and HP groups, respectively.

Secondary outcomes are shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences between the groups in the occurrence of air leak syndrome, re-intubation after 72 hours and before 7 days post-extubation, intraventricular hemorrhage, trauma of the nasal septum, feeding intolerance, and maximum FiO2. However, infants in the HP group spent more days on nCPAP than infants in the NP group.

DISCUSSION

Our study is the first randomized controlled trial that has compared the effects of different nCPAP levels applied immediately after extubation on the rate of successful extubation in preterm infants. In the available scientific literature, there is little evidence for the adequate level of nCPAP that should be used during the post extubation phase. A systematic review on the subject suggested that ≥ 5 cmH2O is more effective than lower levels; a conclusion based on the lack of demonstrable benefits of lower nCPAP pressures rather than any comparison with higher levels. Therefore, our study re-opens the question on the level of nCPAP that should be applied to these infants during the immediate post-extubation phase and provide some new data on that.

Unfortunately the study was interrupted prematurely because the unit adopted the use of nCPAP immediately after birth as standard of care resulting in fewer infants submitted to invasive ventilation, presence of a concomitant study competing for patient enrollment and difficulties in obtaining informed consent before the first extubation attempt. After the enrollment of 24 patients, we calculated that we had 80% power to detect differences in proportions from 84% to 42%, anticipating that between 75 to 85% of the neonates assigned to the HP group would remain extubated at 72 hours post-extubation.

The rate of extubation failure in preterm infants depends on a number of factors such as birth weight, gestational age, type of respiratory support applied after extubation, age of extubation, and definitions of failure or success.8,22-24 A meta-analysis on the use of nCPAP or NIPPV after extubation has reported a failure rate similar to our study; between 37 to 44% in infants extubated to nCPAP.16 In the overall population the need of re-intubation within the first 72 hours after extubation was 25%, which was similar to our previous experience8 and other reports.5,25 Re-intubation occurred in only one infant (9%) in the NP group compared to 5 (38%) of the HP group. Of the infants that failed extubation according to our clinical criteria only 1/5 (20%) in the NP group compared to 5/6 (83%) in the HP group required re-intubation. Any inference about these findings is limited given the small number of patients. High levels of nCPAP have been associated with thoraco-abdominal asynchrony and diaphragm dysfunction26,27 and animal studies have demonstrated that nCPAP levels of 8 cmH2O can induce over distention and lung injury in the presence of lung and systemic inflammation.28,29 Physiological studies showing beneficial effects of higher nCPAP levels have evaluated more mature infants over very short periods of time.13,14,30 Therefore, it is possible that high nCPAP levels applied immediately after extubation, in extreme immature infants with minimal lung disease, can lead to over distention, progressive respiratory fatigue, and need of re-intubation. Perhaps, nCPAP should be initiated at lower levels and titrated towards higher values only in infants presenting with progressive respiratory deterioration; an approach that should be investigated in the future.

Although high nCPAP levels may cause air leaks and cardiovascular compromise, in the present study we did not find any differences in the rate of adverse events between the two groups. Infants in the HP group stayed longer under nCPAP therapy when compared to infants in the NP group. We speculate that this was likely due to a slower weaning strategy in infants receiving higher pressures; probably related to the lack of blinding.

Our study has some important limitations. We did not measure the levels of positive pressure at the nasal prongs or proximal airways. In vitro studies have demonstrated that the pressure transmitted is very similar to the set pressure31 but in the clinical setting this is quite different since variable leaks and dynamic changes in respiratory mechanics are common. A short report in preterm infants showed a significant decrease in the pressure transmitted to the pharynx when the infant’s mouth was open, even when the pressure was increased from 5 to 8 cmH2O.32 However, active measures to close the mouth of preterm infants over an extended period of time are difficult to perform and were not used as part of our protocol. Therefore, it is possible that the higher level of nCPAP used has not translated into significant differences on the transmitted pressures between the two groups. Another limitation was the small sample size and our results should be interpreted as data that can be used in a systematic review, meta-analysis and/or for the design of future trials in this important subject. This investigation has several strengths. Although it was not possible to blind, the trial was designed and implemented properly. We blinded whenever possible (e.g. data analyst), used standard clinical criteria for the primary outcome of extubation success, and minimized bias by proper randomization, adequate allocation concealment and participant retention. We used ranges of pressure that reflect current practices and nCPAP was applied to both groups with the same device and delivery systems, which are known to be confounders for effectiveness and side effects. Therefore, this is the first randomized controlled pilot trial to provide an unbiased estimate of the short-term effects of different nCPAP levels during the immediate post-extubation period.

CONCLUSION

There were no important differences in rates of successful extubation or morbidity in the 72 hours following extubation with a higher rather than standard nCPAP level. Infants randomized to the HP group stayed longer on nCPAP.  Further trials with larger sample sizes and long-term clinical outcomes are required.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to thank E. Pullenayegum (Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Center for Evaluation of Medicines, McMaster University) for guidance with the trial design and statistical analysis.

REFERENCES

  1. Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med 1971; 284(24):1333-40.
  2. Avery ME, Tooley WH, Keller JB, Hurd SS, Bryan MH, Cotton RB, et al. Is chronic lung disease in low birth weight infants preventable? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics 1987; 79(1):26-30.
  3. Ammari A, Suri M, Milisavljevic V, Sahni R, Bateman D, Sanocka U, et al. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 2005; 147(3):341-7.
  4. NICHD Neonatal Research Network, Support Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver: Early CPAP versus Surfactant in Extremely Preterm Infants. New Engl J Med 2010; 362:1970-9.
  5. Morley CJ, Davis PG. Continuous positive airway pressure: scientific and clinical rationale. Curr Opin Pediatr 2008; 20(2):119-24.
  6. Miller JD, Carlo WA. Pulmonary complications of mechanical ventilation in neonates. Clin Perinatol 2008; 35(1):273-81.
  7. Ambalavanan N, Carlo WA. Ventilatory strategies in the prevention and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol 2006; 30(4):192-9.
  8. Hermeto F, Bottino MN, Vaillancourt K, Sant’Anna GM. Implementation of a respiratory therapist-driven protocol for neonatal ventilation: impact on the premature population. Pediatrics 2009; 123(5):e907-16.
  9. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001; 107(4):638-41.
  10. Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, Bhandari V. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 200;, 108(1):13-7.
  11. Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, Ramicone E, Chan L, Ramanathan R. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J Perinatol 1999; 19(6 Pt 1):413-8.
  12. Griffiths GB, Noworaj A, Mortola JP. End-expiratory level and breathing pattern in the newborn. J Appl Physiol 1983; 55(1 Pt 1):243-9.
  13. Magnenant E, Rakza T, Riou Y, Elgellab A, Matran R, Lequien P, et al. Dynamic behavior of respiratory system during nasal continuous positive airway pressure in spontaneously breathing premature newborn infants. Ped Pulmonol 2004; 37(6):485-91.
  14. Elgellab A, Riou Y, Abbazine A, Truffert P, Matran R, Lequien P, et al. Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) on breathing pattern in spontaneously breathing premature newborn infants. Int Care Med 2001; 27(11):1782-7.
  15. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(2):CD000143.
  16. de Paoli AG, Davis PG, Lemyre B. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2003; 92(1):70-5.
  17. de Paoli AG, Morley C, Davis PG. Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88(3):F168-72.
  18. de Paoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, Morley CJ. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008(1):CD002977.
  19. Aly H, Milner JD, Patel K, El-Mohandes AA. Does the experience with the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure improve over time in extremely low birth weight infants? Pediatrics 2004; 114(3):697-702.
  20. Pandit PB, Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Habib RH. Work of breathing during constant- and variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2001; 108(3):682-5.
  21. Liptsen E, Aghai ZH, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, Long J, et al. Work of breathing during nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a comparison of bubble vs variable-flow devices. J Perinatol 2005; 25(7):453-8.
  22. Barrington KJ. Extubation failure in the very preterm infant. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2009; 85(5):375-7.
  23. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Endo A, Cherian S, Rafferty GF. Prediction of extubation failure in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002; 86(1):F32-5.
  24. Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Predicting successful extubation of very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91(3):F180-3.
  25. Gupta S, Sinha SK, Tin W, Donn SM. A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus Infant Flow Driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr 2009; 154(5):645-50.
  26. Michna J, Jobe AH, Ikegami M. Positive end-expiratory pressure preserves surfactant function in preterm lambs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160(2):634-9.
  27. Rehan VK, Laiprasert J, Nakashima JM, Wallach M, McCool FD. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on diaphragm dimensions in preterm infants. J Perinatol 2001; 21(8):521-4.
  28. Polglase GR, Hillman NH, Ball MK, Kramer BW, Kallapur SG, Jobe AH, et al. Lung and systemic inflammation in preterm lambs on continuous positive airway pressure or conventional ventilation. Pediatr Res 2009; 65(1):67-71.
  29. Tsuchida S, Engelberts D, Roth M, McKerlie C, Post M, Kavanagh BP. Continuous positive airway pressure causes lung injury in a model of sepsis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2005; 289(4):L554-64.
  30. Courtney SE, Kahn DJ, Singh R, Habib RH. Bubble and ventilator-derived nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: work of breathing and gas exchange. J Perinatol 2011; 31(1):44-50.
  31. Kahn DJ, Courtney SE, Steele AM, Habib RH. Unpredictability of delivered bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure: role of bias flow magnitude and nares-prong air leaks. Pediatr Res 2007; 62(3):343-7.
  32. de Paoli AG, Lau R, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Pharyngeal pressure in preterm infants receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90(1):F79-81.

PII: eJNR21606072v3i3p2y2013

Written by Jonathan Swanson

February 7th, 2013 at 9:00 pm

Posted in

Leave a Reply